I don't think you need the de() wrapper.
Myself, I would reevaluate this logic entirely as it looks very suseptible to abuse (meaning, a hacker could do serious damage if you're not VERY careful).
I don't think you need the de() wrapper.
Myself, I would reevaluate this logic entirely as it looks very suseptible to abuse (meaning, a hacker could do serious damage if you're not VERY careful).