es336td wrote:
Understood... but why does it appear on one system as 123.87654321 and the other as 123,87700000? The code and databases are identical except for the data source name.
I wouldn't know why. What I know is that 123.87654321 requires Number(11,8). In fact, if you expect the whole-number part of the data to have a maximum of, say, 9999, then you should set the type as Number(12,8).